Sunil Sahu v. Ranjita Sahu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a criminal review petition but withdrew it via memo dated 6.11.2023. The high court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the petition without a substantive hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRL REV NO. 462 OF 2013
Sunil Sahu @ Sunil Kumar …. Petitioners Sahu and others
Mr. B.R.Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
Ranjita Sahu and another …. Opp.Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
16.11.2023
Order No. Hybrid Mode
02 . 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that as per
instruction from the petitioner, petitioner does not want to
pursue the present petition. Memo dated 6.11.2023 filed on
behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.
2. The petition stands disposed of.
………………………
(M.S.Sahoo)
Judge
dutta
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AJIT KUMAR DUTTA Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: ohc Date: 20-Nov-2023 20:07:58
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sunil Sahu @ Sunil Kumar and others
- respondent
Ranjita Sahu and another
Coram
M.S. Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court