The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed the petitioner's petition challenging an order of cognizance due to inordinate delay without any application for limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 47 of 2022
Balaram Giri
…. Petitioner
On behalf of
Mr. Satya Sindhu Kashyap, Advocate
-versus-
Suryamani Behera
…. Opposite Party None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER Order No. 22.06.2023 02. 1. There is no explanation for the inordinate delay in filing the present petition on 6th January, 2022 challenging the order of cognizance dated 5th October, 2021 and order dated 7th October, 2021 passed by the J.M.F.C., Balasore in ICC Case No.313 of 2020. Even no application has been filed for limitation.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
SK Jena/Secy.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANJAY KUMAR JENA Designation: SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 24-Jun-2023 14:22:12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to set aside the delay in filing the petition challenging the order of cognizance.
Balaram Giri
Suryamani Behera
Dr. S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
