The High Court of Orissa dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed by the petitioner challenging orders of cognizance passed by the J.M.F.C., holding he offered no explanation for inordinate delay and no application for limitation was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 46 of 2022
Balaram Giri …. Petitioner
On behalf of
Mr. Satya Sindhu Kashyap, Advocate
-versus-
Jasmine Jyoti Aqua Culture Farm
…. Opposite Party None
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER Order No. 22.06.2023 02. 1. There is no explanation for the inordinate delay in filing the present petition on 6th January, 2022 challenging the order of cognizance dated 5th October, 2021 and order dated 7th October, 2021 passed by the J.M.F.C., Balasore in ICC Case No.314 of 2020. Even no application has been filed for limitation.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
SK Jena/Secy.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANJAY KUMAR JENA Designation: SECRETARY Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 24-Jun-2023 14:22:12
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should entertain a petition filed after an inordinate delay without an application for limitation.
Balaram Giri
Dr. S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
