Quashed
Anil Meher v. State of Orissa
Orissa HCCRLMC/3711/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court disposed of the CRLM as infructuous because the petitioner had already been acquitted in the underlying criminal case, making the quashing petition unnecessary.
What did the court decide?
CRLMC dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
CRLMC No.3711 of 2016
¶3
Anil Meher
¶4
…. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Sahoo, Advocate
¶5
-versus-
¶6
State of Orissa
¶7
…. Opp. Party Mr. S.R. Roul, A.S.C.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
¶10
Order No.
¶12
ORDER 04.01.2023
¶13
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the CRLM for quashing proceedings became infructuous due to the petitioner's acquittal in the underlying criminal case.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Anil Meher
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
AI extract
G. Satapathy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court