In CRLMC No.234 of 2016, the High Court of Orissa disposed of the matter, holding no infirmity in the impugned order regarding evidence appreciation, despite counsel's submission on judicial notice of signatures and opposition to witness recall.
The CRLMC is disposed of with no further orders as no infirmity is found in the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.234 of 2016
Alekha Bihari Das and others
…. Petitioners
Mr. S.K. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opp. Party Mr. S.R. Roul, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No. 03.01.2023
( G. Satapathy) Judge
Priyajit
// 2 //
Alekha Bihari Das and others
State of Orissa
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
