The High Court of Orissa allowed a CRLMA seeking restoration of a CRLMC application dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's clerk missing an item in the cause list. The interim order was revived for four weeks.
CRLMA allowed; CRLMC No.2428 of 2018 restored; interim order revived for four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMA No.404 of 2023
Sasanka Jena @ Shashanka Shekhar Jena
Petitioner
Mr. J.K. Khuntia, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another
…. Opposite Parties Mr. A.P. Das, A.S.C. Mr. P.K. Nanda, Advocate for O.P. No.2
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
20.12.2023
// 2 //
subject to depositing cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred) in the Advocates’ Welfare Fund of Orissa High Court Bar Association within two weeks and furnishing money receipt thereof in proof of deposit.
Debasis
( A.K. Mohapatra )
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: DEBASIS AECH Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CUTTACK. Date: 27-Dec-2023 16:32:49
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present CRLMA should be allowed to restore the CRLMC application dismissed due to non-prosecution.
Whether the interim order passed in the restored CRLMC should be revived.
Sasanka Jena @ Shashanka Shekhar Jena
State of Odisha
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
