Petitioner sought restoration of an application dismissed for non-prosecution due to the lawyer's unavoidable absence in another court. The court restored the matter upon depositing prosecution costs into the Advocates' Welfare Fund.
CRLMA allowed; CRLMC No.1077 of 2018 restored upon deposit of Rs.500/- in Advocates' Welfare Fund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMA No.03 of 2022
Binaya Kumar Samal
…. Petitioner Mr.P.K.Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
Snigdha Dash
…. Opposite Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
19.12.2023
// 2 //
Advocates’ Welfare Fund of Orissa High Court Bar Association within seven days and furnishing money receipt thereof in proof of deposit. 6. Accordingly, the CRLMA is allowed. The CRLMC No.1077 of 2018 be restored to file.
RKS
( A.K. Mohapatra )
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: RAMESH KUMAR SINGH Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 26-Dec-2023 11:37:51
Signature Not Verified
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to restore a Civil Revisional Matter application dismissed for non-prosecution due to a single day default.
Binaya Kumar Samal
Snigdha Dash
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
