Abani Pr Parida v. Nabaghana Jena
Case brief
What is this about?
In a CRLLP filed by the petitioner to appeal an acquittal judgment under Section 138 NI Act, 1881, the court noted the petitioner's lack of appearance, absence from dates, and inactivity causing delayed listing. The court observed the petitioner's disinterest.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLLP No. 64 of 2005
Abani Prasad Parida
Petitioner
None
-versus-
Nabaghana Jena
Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER Order No. 09.11.2023
Hybrid Mode
- The CRLLP has been filed by the petitioner seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment dated 16.03.2005 passed in I.C.C. No.1211 of 2002 acquitting the opposite party U/s.138 of N.I. Act, 1881.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow leave to file an appeal against a judgment acquitting the opposite party under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Abani Prasad Parida
- respondent
Nabaghana Jena
Coram
M.S. Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court