The High Court at Cuttack disposed of a criminal revision petition challenging an order under Cr.P.C. Sections 144 and 145. The court held the matter is civil in nature and nothing survives on present facts, without providing instructions to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLREV No.180 of 2012
Smt. Hemalata Raj and …. Petitioners another
Mr. P.K. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Bijuli Jena and others …. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
08.11.2023 Hybrid Mode
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
jyostna
nothing would survive at present as far as present lis is concerned.
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOSTNARANI MAJHEE Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 10-Nov-2023 18:00:27
Page 2 of 2
Smt. Hemalata Raj and another
Bijuli Jena and others
M.S. SAHOO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
