Nityananda Barik v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant filed a criminal appeal which was not pressed by the learned counsel. The High Court disposed of the appeal as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLA No.323 of 2023
Nityananda Barik ….
Appellant
Mr.J.K. Majhi, Advocate
-versus-
1. State of Odisha 2. Babula Hembram
….
Respondents
Mr.P.B. Tripathy
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
ORDER
Order No. 15.05.2023
03. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).
Mr. B.K. Mahapatra, learned counsel files Vakalatnama for the informant, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press this criminal appeal.
Accordingly, the CRLA stands disposed of as not pressed.
( S.K. Sahoo) Signature Not Verified Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: SIPUN BEHERA Designation: Junior StenographerSipun Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 17-May-2023 13:33:31
Nityananda Barik
State of Odisha
Babula Hembram
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court