Petitioner in a BLAPL filed after criminal trial was acquitted. This Court held the writ petition infructuous and disposed of the matter as no further adjudication was necessary.
BLAPL disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.518 of 2021
Abhiram Pradhan …. Petitioner
Mr.Devashis Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opp. Party
Mr. Manoranjan Mishra Addl. Standing Counsel
Order No.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 15.05.2023 This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the meantime, judgment has been pronounced in the learned trial Court and the petitioner has been acquitted.
In view of such submission, the BLAPL stands disposed of as infructuous.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSipun Signed by: SIPUN BEHERA Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 17-May-2023 13:33:32
Abhiram Pradhan
State of Odisha
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
