Hybrid contempt hearing where petitioner was unrepresented. Court noted notice issued in 2012 was not complied with. Given the age of the petition, the complaint was dropped without adjournment.
Contempt proceeding dropped due to non-compliance and age of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.633 of 2012
Khirod Ranjan Mohanty ….. Petitioner
None
Vs.
Chandra Sekhar Kumar, I.A.S., ….. Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Bhubaneswar & Another
Opposite Parties
Mr. L. Samantaray, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
03.08.2023
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Signature Not Verified Laxmikant
Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 03-Aug-2023 15:18:57
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceeding initiated in 2012 should be continued given the lack of compliance by opposite parties for years.
Khirod Ranjan Mohanty
Chandra Sekhar Kumar, I.A.S.
B.R. SARANGI
MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
