Rilu Naik v. G.Mathivasan, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court considered a Contempt Petition regarding compliance with an order regularizing the petitioner's service. The Court found services regularized but with retrospective effect leading to premature retirement on the corrected retirement date. The dismissal of petitioner's complaint on retirement grounds as a fresh cause of action led to dropping the petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition dropped; petitioner advised to file fresh Writ Petition if aggrieved by premature retirement order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC NO.4195 of 2023
Rilu Naik
…. Petitioner Mr.J.R.Dash, Advocate
-versus-
G.Mathivasan, I.A.S. and others
…. Contemnors Mr.A.P.Das, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
04
ORDER 02.09.2023
- This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order requiring regularization of the petitioner's service has been complied with.
Whether a fresh cause of action arose due to the premature retirement of the petitioner after regularization.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rilu Naik
Coram
A.K. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court