Petitioner appeared under contempt proceedings but stated he had no instructions. The court dropped the proceedings in view of this submission.
Contempt proceedings dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.178 of 2014
Brajendra Kumar Panda ….. Petitioner Mr. S.Ku. Mishra, Advocate Vs. Block Development Officer, ….. Opposite Party Bahanaga Block
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
18.05.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
03.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no
instructions in the matter.
3. In view of the above submission, this contempt proceeding
stands dropped.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
Aks JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ASWINI KUMAR SETHY Designation: PA (SECY-IN-CHARGE) Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 18-May-2023 18:47:00
Brajendra Kumar Panda
Block Development Officer
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
