Harekrushna Sahoo v. Commissioner,B.M.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.1574 of 2013
Harekrushna Sahoo & Others
….. Petitioners Mr. S.Ku. Mishra, Advocate Vs.
Bhubaneswar Municipal ….. Opposite Parties Corporation & Others
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
18.05.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
03.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has no
instructions in the matter.
3. In view of the above submission, this contempt proceeding
stands dropped.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
Aks JUDGE
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ASWINI KUMAR SETHY Designation: PA (SECY-IN-CHARGE) Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 18-May-2023 18:47:00
Harekrushna Sahoo & Others
Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation & Others
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court