In this contempt petition filed for non-compliance of a previous order, the High Court granted the opposite party one month further time to comply, warning of deliberate violation if missed.
Granted one month further time to the opposite party contemnor to comply with the order dated 31.10.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.1486 of 2023
Himadri Kar
…. Petitioner Mr.H.S.Panda, Adv .
-versus-
Kapilendra Mishra, O.E.S-1 …. Opposite Party State Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
18.04.2023
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner for noncompliance of the order dated 31.10.2022 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.25682 of 2022.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsel for the Parties, this Contempt Petition is disposed of by granting one month further time to the Opp. PartyContemnor to comply the order passed on 31.10.2022. However, if the order is not complied with within the extended time, it will be held as deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant extension of time to the contemnor to comply with the impugned order.
Himadri Kar
Kapilendra Mishra
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
