In a contempt petition filed for non-compliance of a court order, the court granted one month's extension to the respondents to comply, warning that failure would be treated as deliberate violation.
One month further time granted to Opposite Parties to comply with the order dated 22.04.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.1433 of 2023
Ujjal Kumar Behera
…. Petitioner
-versus-
Aswathy S, I.A.S. & Anr. …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
14.03.2023
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner for noncompliance of the order dated 22.04.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.C.(OAC) No.699 of 2018.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsel for the Parties, this Contempt Petition is disposed of by granting one month further time to the Opp. PartiesContemnors to comply with the order passed on 22.04.2022. However, if the order is not complied with within the extended time, it will be held as deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
Ujjal Kumar Behera
Aswathy S, I.A.S. & Anr.
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
