Prasanta Ku.Mohanty v. Jahana Ara Begum
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition disposed of after respondents complied with a prior order by filing a communication letter regarding the Board's decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No. 1371 of 2018
Prasanta Ku. Mohanty & Ors.
Petitioners
Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate
-versus-
Jahana Ara Begum & Anr.
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.S. Rao, Sr. Advocate along with
Mr. A.A. Mishra, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
21.12.2023
Order No
34. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 15.12.2023, Mr. S.S. Rao, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the Board produced copy of the letter dtd.18.12.2023, wherein Petitioner have been communicated with the decision taken by the Board pursuant to the order passed by this Court. Copy of the communication along with the memo filed in Court be kept in record.
3. In view of such compliance, the Contempt Petition is disposed of. If Petitioners are aggrieved by the order in question, it is open for them to challenge the same.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 22-Dec-2023 17:41:49
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
Prasanta Ku. Mohanty & Ors.
Jahana Ara Begum & Anr.
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court