This Court disposed of a civil miscellaneous petition challenging a suit dismissal for default. It observed that the petitioners had not applied for restoration of the suit under Order IX Rule 4 CPC and directed them to do so from the trial Court.
Petitioners directed to file application for restoration of suit under Order IX Rule 4 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 53 of 2019
D.Gitanjali Dora and another …. Petitioners Mr. Niranjan Singh-1, Advocate
-versus-
D.Nityananda Dora and others …. Opp. Parties Miss Samriddha Krishna Behera, Advocate (For Opposite Party No.1)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
11.04.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit dismissed for default can be restored under Order IX Rule 4 CPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.Gitanjali Dora and another
D.Nityananda Dora and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
