Petitioner filed a petition (BLAPL No. 7899 of 2023) seeking some order. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition via a memo. The State opposed citing past criminal allegations. The High Court dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed. No withdrawal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 7899 of 2023
Somesh Das
Petitioner
Mr. B.B.Routray, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
Opp.Party
Mr. D. Nayak, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
10.11.2023
Order No. Hybrid Mode
04 . 1. In terms of the order dated 31.08.2023, affidavit was to be filed on behalf of the petitioner indicating past allegations of criminal activity, if any. Thereafter on 4.10.2023 the matter was adjourned to comply with the order dated 31.08.2023.
Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition and files memo dated 10.11.2023 indicating the same, which is taken on record.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: AJIT KUMAR DUTTA Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: ohc Date: 20-Nov-2023 19:36:52
………………………
(M.S.Sahoo) Judge
dutta
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition filed by the petitioner should be allowed after the petitioner seeks its withdrawal.
Somesh Das
State of Odisha
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
