Petitioners, the father-in-law and brother-in-law of the victim in a sexual assault case, sought bail. The court found serious allegations supported by Section 164 CrPC statements and rejected the application on prima facie grounds.
Application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.8698 of 2023
Kshirod Chandra Swain and ….
another
Petitioners
Ms. A. Ray, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
19.12.2023.
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
rejected.
(Sashikanta Mishra)
AKB Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ASHOK KUMAR BEHERA Designation: ADR-cum-Addl. Principal Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 20-Dec-2023 11:17:32
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail application should be entertained given serious allegations of sexual assault by in-laws and prima facie evidence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KSHIROD CHANDRA SWAIN
STATE OF ODISHA
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
