The High Court rejected the petitioners apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving an unlocated victim girl. Since the victim was not rescued as yet, the application was deemed unfit for consideration and was rejected.
The application apprehending arrest was rejected as it was not inclined to entertain due to the victim not being traced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 7546 of 2023
Tarun Das and others
…. Petitioners
Mr. P.C. Jena, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha
….
Opposite Party
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
15.11.2023
Order No.
5.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BHIGAL CHANDRA TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cutt ack Date: 20-Nov-2023 11:21:33 B.C. Tudu
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for bail or anticipatory bail should be entertained where the victim is not traced.
Tarun Das and others
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
