In this anticipatory bail application, the High Court of Orissa rejected the plea. The court found the petitioner was not named in the FIR and no material justified the apprehension of arrest, though liberty was given to renew the prayer if implicated later.
Application rejected; liberty granted to renew prayer if implicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 13200 of 2023
Tukuna Digal
….
Petitioner
Mr. A. Das, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
15.11.2023
Order No. 01.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BHIGAL CHANDRA TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cutt ack Date: 20-Nov-2023 11:21:33
( Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
B.C. Tudu
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in view of actual absence of name in FIR and lack of material justifying apprehension of arrest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tukuna Digal
State of Odisha
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
