The High Court rejected an application against bail in legal aid where the petitioner faced arrest in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 417, 493, and 506. The court declined to entertain the application due to the nature of accusations and the recorded victim statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.10955 of 2023
Baibaswata Pandey @ Kishor
…. Petitioner
Mr. J. Sahu,
Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
Order No.
ORDER 07.12.2023.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., I am not inclined to entertain this ABLAPL which is therefore, rejected.
(Sashikanta Mishra) AKB Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ASHOK KUMAR BEHERA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 08-Dec-2023 12:05:30
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application against bail in legal aid (ABLAPL) should be entertained given the apprehension of arrest for alleged offences under Sections 417/493/506 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baibaswata Pandey @ Kishor
State of Odisha
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ASHOK KUMAR BEHERA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
