The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition after submitting that the challenge had been comprehensively decided by the Apex Court. The Court granted leave for withdrawal. demise of the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.1327 of 2013
Rama Chandra Behura
..……. Petitioner
Mr. Deba Prasad Das, Adv. -Versus-
State of Odisha & another
..…….. Opp. Parties
Mr. J.P. Pattnaik,
Government Advocate
Mr. Srimanta Das, Sr. S.C. (Vig.)
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
05.08.2022
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/ Physical Mode).
2. Mr. D.P. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the challenge projected in this petition has been decided by the Apex Court comprehensively.
3. In view of that, the petitioner prays leave of this Court to withdraw this petition.
4. Leave is granted.
5. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Subhasis
2
3
Rama Chandra Behura
State of Odisha
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
