Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

M/S.Maa Girija Ispat Vs Oerc — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2022)

Home
Orissa HC
2022
M/S.Maa Girija Ispat Vs OercM/S.Maa Girija Ispat v. Oerc

Dismissed

M/S.Maa Girija Ispat v. Oerc

Orissa HC5 Aug 2022WP(C)/9517/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition filed by M/s. Maa Girija Ispat Pvt. Ltd. against OERC was dismissed for non-prosecution.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 9517 of 2014

M/s. Maa Girija Ispat Pvt. …. Petitioner Ltd.

Mr. S. Pradhan on behalf of Mr. T.K. Pattnayak, Advocate

-versus-

OERC & others

…. Opp. Parties

Mr. B.K. Nayak(1), Advocate for O.P. Nos.2, 3 & 4

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M. S. SAHOO

ORDER

Order No.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
M/s. Maa Girija Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
respondent
OERC & others

Coram

AI extract

S. Talapatra

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 5 Aug 2022 · August
Registered: 13 May 2014
Case no.: WP(C)/9517/2014

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Subhasis Talapatra M.s.sahoo

Banka @ Gopabandhu Vs State
4 Aug 2022
Kumkum Ghosh Vs Hara Prasad Ghosh
4 Aug 2022
Dr.Satyabrata Pattnaik Vs State of Odisha
4 Aug 2022
Mahendra Hembram Vs State of Odisha
5 Aug 2022

Cite this judgement

M/S.Maa Girija Ispat v. Oerc, WP(C)/9517/2014 (OD), decided on 5 August 2022.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

S. Talapatra and M. S. Sahoo

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The petitioner failed to provide instructions to its counsel. Consequently, the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack dismissed the writ petition without addressing the merits.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

05.08.2022

05.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Mr. S. Pradhan, learned counsel appearing on instruction of Mr. T.K. Pattnayak, learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that the counsel does not have any instruction.

3. In view of the said statement, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(S. Talapatra) Judge

(M.S. Sahoo) Judge

RRJena/GS

M. S. Sahoo

CNR

ODHC010024632014

Topic

Service and Employment

Bench

Subhasis Talapatra M.s.sahoo

Disposal

Disposed Off

Rama Ch.Behura Vs State and Ors.

5 Aug 2022

Debitosh Manna Vs State and Ors.

5 Aug 2022