The Orissa High Court dismissed the Writ Petition on technical grounds due to lack of instructions from the petitioner, granting liberty to file a fresh application if cause of action exists.
Liberty granted to file a fresh application if any cause of action subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC (TAC ) No.13 of 2016
B.V. Subhalakshmi
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
Opp. Parties
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No
14.7.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has received no instruction from his client.
3 . Accordingly, the WPC(TAC) is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the Petitioner that he may file a fresh application, if any cause of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
sangita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the WPC should be dismissed on account of no instruction from the petitioner.
B.V. Subhalakshmi
State of Odisha
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
