Ashok Kumar Jena v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
In WP(C)(OA) No.455 of 2016, the Orissa High Court directed the State of Odisha to decide on a pending representation regarding the petitioner's termination and financial benefits within three months, without expressing an opinion on merits. The writ petition was disposed upon issuing this direction.
What did the court decide?
Directed Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the pending representation within three months.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OA) No.455 of 2016
Ashok Kumar Jena
….
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
18.07.2022
Order No
02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the State of Odisha must decide on pending representation regarding petitioner's termination within three months.
Whether the termination order with service and financial benefits should be quashed.
Whether any other relief is appropriate in favour of the applicant.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ashok Kumar Jena
- respondent
State of Odisha & Ors.
Coram
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court