The writ petition was dismissed as the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted he had received no instruction from his client. Liberty was granted to file a fresh petition if the cause of action subsequently subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OAC) No.1570 of 2016
Khirod Kumar Nanda & Others
Petitioners
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
04.08.2022
Order No 3. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has received no instruction from his client.
3. Accordingly, the WPC (OAC) is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the Petitioner that he may file a fresh petition, if any cause of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Khirod Kumar Nanda
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
