The petitioner argued that the matter had become infructuous as he had obtained the claimed benefit. The High Court dismissed the public interest litigation as infructuous.
The WPC(OAC) was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No.662 of 2018
Padmanav Dwivedi …. Petitioner Mr. L.K. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. R.N. Mishra, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER Order No. 13.09.2022 01. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner is present and submits that the Petitioner has got the benefit as claimed for. Hence, matter has been rendered infructuous.
Order No.
KC Bisoi
Padmanav Dwivedi
State of Odisha
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
