Tarini Charan Patnaik v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Held the writ petition as infructuous in view of the fact that the matter has become rendered so and dismissed the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No.542 of 2018
Tarini Charan Patnaik
…. Petitioner Mr. L.K. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. R.N. Mishra, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER Order No. 13.09.2022 01. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner is present and submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the WPC (OAC) is dismissed as having infructuous. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
Order No.
KC Bisoi
Tarini Charan Patnaik
State of Odisha
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court