Petitioners withdrew their writ petition, leading to the disposal of the matter as withdrawn in terms of a filed memo. The court directed parties to utilize a printout of the order from the High Court website for evidence purposes.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 556 of 2019
Arabinda Panda & Ors.
….
Petitioners
Mr. B.S. Tripathy, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha and Anr. ….
Opp. Parties
State Counsel
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
25.01.2022
Order No. 03
This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021 and Court’s office order circulated vide Memo Nos. 514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
GDS
Page 1 of 1
Arabinda Panda & Ors.
State of Odisha and Anr.
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
