In a writ petition that came up after a long delay and following a COVID-19-related adjournment request by the petitioner, the High Court of Orissa rejected the plea for adjournment and disposed of the matter for want of prosecution.
The writ petition is disposed of for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 159 of 2005
Lata Biswal
….
Petitioner
Mr. Rajib Rath, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Ors. ….
Opp. Parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
25.01.2022
Order No. 01
This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s
Page 1 of 2
website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021 and Court’s office order circulated vide Memo Nos. 514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
GDS
Page 2 of 2
Lata Biswal
State of Odisha & Ors.
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
