Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Md. Rahamatullah Vs State of Odisha — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2022)

Home
Orissa HC
2022
Md. Rahamatullah Vs State of OdishaMd. Rahamatullah v. State of Odisha

Dismissed

Md. Rahamatullah v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC24 Jan 2022WPC(OAC)/3345/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the petitioner's writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time on 24.01.2022 via video conferencing.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

A writ petition was dismissed as it had become infructuous owing to the passage of time. The order was delivered as per prevailing COVID-19 restrictions requiring the use of printed copies from the website.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OAC) No. 3345 of 2009

Md. Rahamatullah

…. Petitioner

M/s M.K.Khuntia & Associates

-Versus -

State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opp. Parties

State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

24.01.2022

Order No. 01

This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that with efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

In view of the above submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25^th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s notice no. 4798 dated 15^th April, 2021 and Court’s Order circulated vide memo Nos. 514 and 515 dated 7^th January, 2022.

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)

Judge

GDS

Page 1 of 1

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Md. Rahamatullah
respondent
State of Odisha & Ors.

Coram

AI extract

B.R. Sarangi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 24 Jan 2022 · January
Registered: 11 Nov 2021
Case no.: WPC(OAC)/3345/2009
CNR: ODHC010574262009
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: B.r.sarangi
Disposal: Disposed Off

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.r.sarangi

Pravash Chandra Moharana Vs Sandip Singh, D.E.O
21 Jan 2022
Ranjan Kumar Samal Vs Brundaban Satapathy, Director, Elementary Education
21 Jan 2022
Chandrika Durga Vs State of Odisha
21 Jan 2022
Khagendra Nayak Vs Bhaskar Sharma,Ias
24 Jan 2022
Khirod Kumar Bhattamisra Vs State of Odisha
24 Jan 2022
Judhistira Pradhan Vs State of Odisha
24 Jan 2022

Cite this judgement

Md. Rahamatullah v. State of Odisha, WPC(OAC)/3345/2009 (OD), decided on 24 January 2022.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

B.R. Sarangi

Parties & counsel