A writ petition where the petitioner was absent at the hearing. The court disposed of the matter without granting adjournment and granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum if a cause of action survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 3106 of 2008
Order No.
01
Prabodh Ch Tripathy …. Petitioner
M/s A.C.Mohanty & Associates
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opp. Parties
.
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
07.01.2022
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
3. Since it is an year old matter, this Court is not inclined
to grant adjournment. However, the writ petition stands disposed of
granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum,
if any cause of action still survives.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
Arun
Page 1 of 1
Prabodh Ch Tripathy
State of Odisha & Ors.
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
