The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition summarily due to an absence of instructions from the petitioner's counsel, granting liberty to approach the authority if a cause of action survives.
Liberty granted to petitioner to approach the authority concerned if any cause of action still survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 1163 of 2008
Jyotsna Mohanty …. Petitioner
M/s D.Pattanayak & Associates -Versus -
State of Odisha & Ors. ….
Opp. Parties State Counsel
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No.
01
ORDER
07.01.2022
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no
instructions, since it is an year old matter, therefore the writ
petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to
approach the authority concerned if any cause of action still
survives.
Arun
Page 1 of 1
Jyotsna Mohanty
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
