The High Court of Odisha dismissed a writ petition as infructuous on the ground of the efflux of time without providing substantive reasoning in this order.
The writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No.40320 of 2021
Ramakanta Padhan
Petitioner(s)
Mr.Pitambar Acharya, Sr.Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Party(s) Mr.R.P.Mohapatra, AGA Mr.B.routray, Sr.Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
14.03.2022
Order No.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
Sks
Page 1 of 1
Ramakanta Padhan
State of Odisha
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
