The High Court of Odisha dismissed the writ petition because the petitioner's counsel submitted no active instruction from the client. Liberty to file a fresh petition was granted if the cause of action still subsists.
Liberty to file a fresh petition if any cause of action still subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OAC) No. 1578 of 2016
Saroj Kumar Beura
…. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
03.08.2022
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has received no instruction from his client.
3. Accordingly, the W.P.C.(OAC) is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, if any cause of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
Saroj Kumar Beura
State of Odisha & Ors.
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
