This High Court, without expressing an opinion on merits, directed Opposite Party No.1 to decide the petitioner's petition on service regularisation within three months and communicated the result. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
Directed Opposite Party No.1 to decide the petition within three months and communicate the result.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OAC) No.1555 of 2016
Mahesh Chandra Mohapatra
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
25.08.2022
Order No
02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.
3 . The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:-
“ In view of the facts mentioned in Para-6 above, the applicant prays for the following relief(s):-
// 2 //
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed an application at Annexure-11 to the Writ Petition before the O.P. No.1, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted Petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to
the Petitioner.
6 . The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Sneha
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the State to decide the pending service regularisation petition within a specified period.
Mahesh Chandra Mohapatra
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
