The single judge, while not expressing an opinion on merits, directed Opposite Party No.2 to decide the petitioner's representation within three months and dispose of the writ petition. The subject matter involves IDCOL.
Direction to Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the representation within three months and communicate the result.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C ) No. 19363 of 2022
Devaraj Prusty
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No 25.08.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel
for the Opposite Parties.
3 . The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the
following prayer:-
“The opp. party No.2 shall not be directed to
observe the petitioner in IDCOL or in any other
subsidiary companies of IDCOL as it is happened in
case of similarly situated persons like that of petitioners
The opp. party No.2 shall not be directed to dispose of the representation dated 21.1.2022 under Annexure-6 within a stipulated period.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that through highlighting her grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation at Annexure-6 to the Writ Petition before the O.P. No.2, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
// 2 //
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
Sangita
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the opposite party to dispose of the petitioner's representation and take a decision within a stipulated period.
Devaraj Prusty
State of Odisha
Biraj Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
