The High Court of Orissa disposed of the pending writ petition as the petitioner had no instructions, granting liberty to approach the concerned authority if any cause of action still survives. The order contains no principles of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 118 of 2012
Bidyadhar Puta
…. Petitioners
Mr. K.K.Swain, Advocate -Versus -
State of Odisha …. Opp. Parties State Counsel
CORAM: DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No. 01
ORDER 05.12.2022 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions, since it is an year old matter. Therefore the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned if any cause of action still survives.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Arun
Page 1 of 1
Bidyadhar Puta
State of Odisha
DR. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
