This Court disposed of a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order by a Sub-Collector under the Orissa Land Reforms Act, holding that other forums are available and the High Court cannot act as an executing court.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw with liberty to approach appropriate forum; petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No. 27670 of 2022
Susanta Kumar Nayak ….. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate Vs.
….. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties
Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER 02.12.2022
Page 1 of 2
OLR Case No. 1/2019 under Section 23 (A) of OLR Act, pursuant to the direction given by the Additional District Magistrate, Kandhamal on 29.07.2022 under Annexure-5, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition as forums are available to him for redressal of his grievance. More so, this Court cannot be treated as the executing Court of the order passed by the SubCollector.
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court can exercise writ jurisdiction to enforce an order passed by a Sub-Collector under the Orissa Land Reforms Act where other forums are available.
Susanta Kumar Nayak
State of Odisha and others
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
