The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on the submission that the petitioner had already been granted the benefit in the meantime.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAB) No.10 of 2016
Nabanita Patro
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No 26.08.2022
2. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has already been
extended with the benefit in the meantime.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as
infructuous.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge
Subrat
Nabanita Patro
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
