The High Court of Orissa dismissed the dismissal of the Ordinance Amendment Pilot Writ Petition (OA) due to lack of client instruction, granting liberty to file a fresh petition if cause of action remains.
Liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition if any cause of action still subsists
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OA) No.715 of 2014
Mahendra Nath Sahu
…. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER 29.03.2022 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has received no instruction from his client.
Order No
3. Accordingly, the W.P.C.(OA) is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the Petitioner that he may file a fresh writ Petition, if any cause of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
Mahendra Nath Sahu
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
