The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ petition (OA) as the petitioner disclosed no instruction from hisClient, but granted liberty to file a fresh petition if the cause of action subsists.
Liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition if the cause of action still subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OA) No.1100 of 2014
Rabindranath Mishra ….
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
28.03.2022
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has received no instruction from his client.
3. Accordingly, the W.P.C.(OA) is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the Petitioner that he may file a fresh writ Petition, if any cause of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
Rabindranath Mishra
State of Odisha & Ors.
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
