The High Court of Orissa, in this Writ Petition under Article 226, dismissed the petition as the learned counsel reported no instruction from the petitioner, granting liberty to file a fresh petition if a cause of action subsisted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OA) No.487 of 2015
Anjan Kumar Behera ….
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER 12.05.2022 Order No 1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has received no instruction from his client.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Anjan Kumar Behera
State of Odisha
Biraj Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
