The High Court of Orissa permitted the petitioner to file a representation regarding service regularization, directing the respondent to consider it within 15 days and decide within three months.
Petitioner permitted to approach Opposite Party No.1 in 15 days; exercise to be completed within 3 months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.16466 of 2022
Gourahari Deep …. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
18.07.2022
Order No
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for both the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following
prayer:-
“(i). Directing the O.P. No.1 and 2 to take a
decision within short stipulated time regarding
regularization of service of the Petitioner in
Group-D post under C.D.V.O., Sambalpur (O.P.
No.4)”.
4. Taking into account the nature of claim made in the Writ Petition and the prayer made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Petitioner is permitted to make a representation before Opp. Party No.1 within a period of 15(fifteen) days from today.
5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed by the Petitioner ventilating his grievances, the same shall be considered by Opp. party No. 1 in accordance with law and also taking into account the order passed under Anenxure-6. The
// 2 //
entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 3(Three) months from the date of receipt of such representation.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Page 2 of 2
Gourahari Deep
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
