Single judge disposed of a one-year-old writ petition that was heard via video conference in the absence of the petitioner's counsel, granting liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 400 of 2010
Madhabananda Das …. Petitioner
M/s M. Kar and associates, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Odisha and others ….
Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No.
01
ORDER
27.01.2022
This matter is taken up through video conferencing
mode.
2. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
3. Mr. S.N. Pattnaik, learned counsel for private opposite
parties.
4. Since it is an year old case, this Court is not inclined
to adjourn the matter. Therefore, this writ petition stands
disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the
appropriate forum in accordance with law, if any cause of
action still survives.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the High Court’s
Page 1 of 2
website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020, as modified by Court’s notice no. 4798 dated 15th April, 2021, and Court’s Office Order circulated vide Memo Nos.514 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.
Ashok
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Page 2 of 2
Madhabananda Das
State of Odisha
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
