On no instructions from the client, the High Court dismissed the Original Application without liberty to approach the court.
Petitioner given liberty to file a fresh petition if cause of action subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OA) No.2242 of 2015
Manoj Kumar Beura
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
23.08.2022
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has received no instruction from his client. 3. Accordingly, the W.P.C.(OA) is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the Petitioner to file a fresh petition, if any cause of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be allowed in the absence of instructions from the client.
Manoj Kumar Beura
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
