Disposed

Prema Sahu v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC23 Aug 2022WP(C)/19152/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court disposed of the writ petition without expressing an opinion on merits. The Court directed the opposite party to decide on the prayer for regular and arrear pension within three months and communicate the result to the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Order directing opposite party No. 5 to decide on the pension and gratuity claims within three months and communicate results.

Prema Sahu Vs State of Odisha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.19152 of 2022

Prema Sahu

Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha & Others

¶7

…. Opposite Parties

¶8

COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

¶9

ORDER Order No 23.08.2022 1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

¶10

2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.

¶11

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:-

¶12

“(i) Why the Opp.Parties will not be directed to grant regular pension as due and admissible in favour of the petitioner w.e.f. May, 2022 as provided under OCS (Pension) Rule, 1992 within a stipulated time; and

¶13

(ii) Why the Opp.Parties will not be directed to sanction the gratuity as due and admissible in favour of the petitioner along with interest within a stipulated time; and

¶14

(iii) Why the Opp.Parties will not be directed to sanction and disburse the arrear pension as due and admissible on such sanction of regular pension within a stipulated time”.

¶15

4. He further submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation on 15.05.2022 at Annexure-4 to the Writ Petition, before the opposite party No.5 but till date nothing has been done

¶16

in the matter. In such background, he prays that a

¶17

// 2 //

¶18

direction be issued to opposite party No.5 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

¶19

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs opposite party No.5 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

¶20

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶21

Subrat

¶22

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge

¶23

Page 2 of 2

Prema Sahu v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prema Sahu v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bipina Bihari Rout Vs State of Orissa

Anjana Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Sabyasachi Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Sarat Chandra Sahu Vs State of Odisha

Bidyadhar Nayak Vs State of Orissa

Bhagirathi Saw Vs State of Odisha